Skip to content

Roadmap

Where the workshop is heading — a public summary for facilitators and contributors. Statuses use honest vocabulary only: in progress, planned, or exploring. Nothing here is a commitment, a schedule, or a promise that work lands by a date. Items listed as shipped live on main; everything else is direction, not delivery.

Internal planning notes (if any) stay out of the published site. This page summarizes; it does not lead over private trackers.

GitOps tool choice is on main, not direction. The GitOps section (S21) ships with Argo CD as the default and Flux as a selectable variant, so facilitators can match the tool their room actually uses without forking the curriculum. Choose one per delivery with --gitops argocd|flux; see running the slides.

Discuss GitOps tool choice →

OpenTelemetry scope is decided, not direction. OpenTelemetry is covered as concepts inside the Prometheus operator section (S23): OTLP as the wire protocol and the collector as a pipeline shape, with traces named but not exercised. No dedicated section, lab, or environment add-on is planned; the decision and the conditions that would reopen it are recorded in ADR 0013.

Discuss OpenTelemetry →

Status vocabulary

Status Meaning
in progress Active work toward something that is not yet on main.
planned Intended next work; architecture or sequencing may still be open.
exploring Under consideration only — explicitly not committed.

Direction

Internationalization — exploring

How to ship additional languages (slides, labs, and quiz) without forking the section library or freezing English authoring is under consideration only. A proposed concept catalog lives in ADR 0014: eight elevator pitches, three full sketches, five short-form, plus a detailed standalone Localization Hub architecture pack. Emerging study direction: a TMS-backed hub + generated locale artifacts + governed slide overrides, with story-derived conformance tests across multiple TMS adapters. No architecture is accepted yet; hand-maintained parallel locale trees (community PR #55) are not the architecture.

Live quizzes — planned (host only; the learner self-check is on main)

Per-section retrieval questions ship as a portable bank in quiz/, and learners answer them today in the static self-check quiz published beside the decks — no host, no account, no backend, nothing stored. That player is a self-check, not an exam: the answers ship inside the static files, and the workshop does not claim otherwise (ADR 0015). The printable facilitator/participant Markdown export stays the offline and show-of-hands path.

What remains direction is the live room picture — one facilitator seeing how the room answered. The architecture spike evaluated three FOSS live-host candidates and adopted none of them (0/3), so the self-hosted live quiz add-on remains planned, with host architecture still open.

Discuss live quizzes →

Standing debts (referenced, not restated)

These are already documented on dedicated pages; the roadmap only points at them:

Discuss standing debts →

Feedback

Each item above links to a GitHub Discussion. Use those threads for interest, trade-offs, and evidence — not as a support queue or a delivery tracker.